Showing posts with label ben afleck. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ben afleck. Show all posts

Monday, 28 March 2016

Why the Batman in Batman v Superman is just not right!!

Now that the reviews of Batman v Superman are out, and it has been pretty much broadly agreed that the movie does not live up to the gigantic hype generated by the title – hard core DC fans might disagree – let’s look at something slightly more complex, something about the way the two of our superheroes have been projected by Zack Snyder and team.

Why is Batman angry with Superman, why does he want Superman finished? Yes, we are shown right at the start why Bruce Wayne doesn’t view Superman very favourably. We can understand anyone feeling a bit antagonized when they or their dear ones are caught in the collateral damage of a big fight.  So he nurses that angst for nearly 2 years before he gets a sniff at a chance of going up against Superman without a certainty of death.

The first hour or so of the movie tries to reinforce again and again as to why the Batman is so angry
with the Superman. He says that ‘even if there is a 1% possibility that this guy can become our enemy, we have to take it as an absolute certainty’. That is a logic that is hard to accept because even that 1% possibility has not substantial evidence, and the Bat of Gotham works on evidence and data rather than gut instincts and hunches. Actually, this version of the Batman shows him as someone far more practical and more evidence-based vigilante than previous versions. Look for example the amount of data he tries to gather about Lex Luthor before launching any action at all. Phone call data, encrypted disks, a Kryptonite consignment –the Bat waits for the jigsaw to fall into place before he swings into action. Yet, when it comes to Superman, the Batman needs one act of collateral damage to decide that   he has to be counted as an enemy. That does not convey the image of an impassionate and objective superhero, this is a superhero who lets his heart get in the way.

We all know that the Batman, whichever version it is, has bad childhood memories that haunt him time and again. In fact, it is those childhood memories that haunt him and drive him towards becoming a vigilante. But, never once have we seen the Batman act on the behest of those childhood memories and insecurities. He always does what is right. But in Batman v Superman, the motive behind his angst towards Superman seems to be driven a lot by his insecurities. We have dream sequences where the Superman unmasks the Batman after having him captured, we have another dream where people asking him to save them from Superman. It is almost as if the deep-seated mental insecurities of Bruce Wayne dictate the targets of the Batman. That is not the sign of a true superhero, that is the sign of a fallible, feeble mind, which is not how we want to see the Batman. The overwhelming feeling I got while watching Batman v Superman is that the Batman was actually jealous of the Superman, jealous of the fact that a more powerful, more omnipresent superhero had taken over from him. It was like Batman shared the insecurities of many ordinary people around him, the insecurity that comes in the presence of someone overwhelmingly powerful. That makes Batman just another person like you and me, which is not how anyone wants to see him.


You might ask, isn’t it the same thing that the movie does with Superman? He too assumes Batman as
a nuisance vigilante just because some newspapers say so. Right, but Superman is much different from Batman. Superman is a reactive superhero, he has always been a reactive superhero. He is the guy who wears his cape when he sees something bad happening on TV and flies to the scene of action and blasts every bad guy with sheer power. We do not expect any great calculative moves from Superman, he just reacts! But, Batman is not so! He analyses, he makes plans and he chooses his adversaries. He doesn’t let situations dictate his actions, he is always one step ahead of the bad guys. Batman is a proactive superhero, and it is this aspect of Batman that was completely messed up in Zack Snyder’s film. He made perfect plans for Superman without analysing whether he was really an enemy, and he analysed Lex Luthor a lot without having any plans for him. That is just not like Batman and we hope DC sets it right in movies to come.

Wednesday, 23 March 2016

BATMAN Vs. SUPERMAN

 YOU ME & CINEMA - BATMAN VS. SUPERMAN REVIEW

 The greatest gladiator match on earth - Son of Krypton against Bat of Gotham, this is not one to be missed, this one has to be witnessed on the big screen. If Marvel redefined the scale of Superhero movies by bringing their biggest characters together, DC has now begun rolling out its own version of heavy duty multi-superhero flicks, and it is reason enough to get excited. But the hype ends the moment you enter theatres. From that point it is only the quality of the movie that can decide whether it wins over the viewer. Does this scripting coup win the viewer?

It starts when Superman is first introduced to humanity, from Man of Steel. We have Bruce Wayne
watching from the sideline as the new hero gets the adulation. What does he feel? The Bruce Wayne from Nolan's universe would have been relieved that he can finally retire, rest his cape and mope around in peace. But this is Zack Snyder's universe and we are not sure about what Bruce feels. Is he insecure, is he confused, or is he jealous? We are not sure at first. Turns out that is how the entire world feels about Superman. It is this insecurity that Lex Luthor wants to prey upon.

Batman vs. Superman starts slow and is in no hurry to pick up the pace. Both Batman and Superman view each other with suspicion, and someone's stoking the fire quite strategically. This though takes quite a long while. The proceedings are dull and we are left searching for moments of adrenaline. The story does keep moving ahead, you can see the isolated dots coming together slowly, but very few moments get the excitement going. That Batman is someone with deep seated psychological insecurities due to a childhood tragedy is well known. Zack Snyder probes that hard, giving us a couple of sequences that are obviously dreams, which seem to slow things down further. You begin to feel that things are taking too long, when finally the Bat and the Superman come face to face. That is really when the film clicks into gear after a fair amount of drifting.

The plot thickens and comes together soon after that. If  Bruce Wayne’s haunting childhood memories are inseparable from Batman movies, so is Krypton inseparable from a Superman movie. The Kryptonite angle is built up slowly and surely around Lex and then there is the final showdown. The usual graph of a superhero movie! What should appeal here is the Batman vs.  Superman angle, which one feels is explored more at a psychological level rather than a more entertaining popcorn level. That could have been very interesting in the hands of a skilled director, more Nolan territory. Subtlety is not Zack Snyder’s forte and so much of it looks more forced than fluid.

And once we are at the business end of the movie, that is when the protagonists have all come to the
right side and are now up against the anatagonist, Zack Snyder jumps onto his style of film making – large scale destruction. If you think he had peaked with Man of Steel, think again before you see this one. We don’t know how many cities he has blown up in the final showdown, frankly we lose count because it movies all the way from some port to Gotham city, burning almost everything in its path. For audiences who are accustomed to the usual Hollywood superhero movie, this is more yawn-inducing stuff as there is little or no originality in the way these confrontations are conceived. Die hard Batman and Superman fans can whistle for a while, but even they go quiet after a while. DC needs someone more inventive, not a technical behemoth like Zack, at the helm of things.

It is obvious that the plan is to dazzle us with a lot of action - big, bombastic action. But with so many superhero movies these days, it is a hard thing to impress audiences that way. What we do enjoy are the little moments, like the ones we saw in the trailer, the ones where the Batman smartly takes down a dozen or so guys, like the one where Batman and Superman fistfight each other, or the small game of wits between Bruce Wayne and the Wonder Woman. The Script, however, does not allow enough room for more such moments because the big action cannot wait. Also disappointing is the complete lack of cheer or brightness in the movie. The Nolan shadow of grim and dark superhero movies hangs on over DC – get rid of it already, please. That’s something only Nolan can do well. Here, we get a movie which looks and feels like it is always waiting for doomsday to happen, as if it is inevitable, as if there is a sword hanging over the world, when the audience can’t frankly see it. We are here to have a good time, but the movie just won’t have any of it, it is too busy being serious. Hardly anyone smiles on screen, except of course for the megalomaniac villain.

That brings us to Jesse Eisenberg who gets to play perhaps the first big ticket character of his career
after Zuckerberg, that is. He is required to play someone one dimensional, and even though he tries to do that with subtlety it doesn’t look that great, the shadow of the Joker lingers on, one guesses. The thoughts that he echoes are also quite similar to what the Joker said, like how someone all powerful cannot be all good and vice versa. Someone who does abominations for the sake of it, someone who couldn’t escape the abominations of his father! The set up of Wonder Woman too has fleeting similarities to that of Selena Kyle from the Dark Knight Rises. These observations just show how big a shadow Nolan cast with his trilogy and how hard they are to forget. This script does not challenge its lead players much. Henry Cavill has to look morose or angry, while Ben Afleck has to look pensive or angry, and there is nothing much in between. The epilogue, even though stretched a bit, gives us glimpses of how the Justice League is going to come together in the coming years and who their adversaries are going to be. The way it panned out gives us hope that this franchise will get better, that this was just the first act of a grand play, the one that sparked off bigger things. But DC will have to rethink its strategy of making superhero movies. If they are going to go all out on heavy duty VFX action with cities crumbling like packs of cards, they must remember that they are very close to saturation. Watch Batman vs. Superman because it is a dream union of superheroes, there are moments (even though only a few) where you can scream your lungs out, there are genuine goose bump moments, but it all does not add up into a great movie. Worth a watch nonetheless.

2.5/5
Dream duo, grim setting, heavy VFX, middling movie!

Friday, 31 October 2014

GONE GIRL: A Perfectly imperfect crime!

Is there anything such as the ‘perfect crime’? Those who believe in truth and cosmic justice and the long hand of the law will tell you that there is no such thing; the truth will always come out. But, what if the crime was intended in such a way that the truth would come out, but not in its true form, but in a manipulated form which would mislead, confuse and concoct a truth that never was. Gone Girl is that ‘perfect crime’. A perfect crime, planned with just the right amount of imperfection that it looked like the perfect crime gone wrong.

Gone Girl is one of the tautest and smartest psychological thrillers to come on screen in recent times. It is not a thriller in the strictest sense of the word, it is a crime drama, that is not as much an investigation as it is a revelation. Yes, the drama unravels itself scene after scene, and it always remains a step ahead of even the shrewdest brains who have watched thrillers by the dozen. A wife has disappeared, and the husband knows nothing about it, her parents know nothing about it, and the neighbours know nothing about it, and now the cops want to know all about it. Prime suspect, the husband. Yes, he has the motive, he has the opportunity and he is the last person who saw her, perhaps the last person who saw her alive! All eyes on the husband as he bumbles through the initial phase of the trouble, he mismanages his image and before he knows he has been branded the killer of ‘Amazing Amy’. Is he the killer or not? Has he committed the perfect crime and set someone up, and will the cops ever get to the bottom of it all? Watch Gone Girl for the answers.

The best thing about Gone Girl is that you don’t know who to trust, at least until the end of the first hour of the film. Everyone is under the shadow of doubt, everyone is a suspect and everyone is a possible victim. And then comes the revelation as the audience gets to know the identity of the manipulator. From then on it is a guessing game as we try to figure out what the manipulator is going to do next; who is going to be set up, who is going to be framed, who is going to be killed? If the first hour confuses you in many ways about the truth, the second hour amazes and startles you with the sheer criminal genius of the manipulator. The modus operandi of the crime is brilliantly explained and you can look and look and think and think about any loopholes and you wouldn’t find them, unless you are a forensic expert maybe. Then, comes the great surprise when the manipulator gets manipulated! Can the manipulator come back?

Gone Girl is a brilliantly written non-linear narrative which puts us back and forth, before the crime and after. Even though it has Ben Afleck, one should give the honors to Rosamund Pike for an absorbing performance. Afleck too has some aces up his sleeve, but Pike takes the cake. Tyler Perry comes across as the ultra-cool litigator.

One thing that elevates Gone Girl to the level of a mind-twisting thriller is the editing; deft and absolutely controlled. The economy of sound in the entire movie is also very much helpful to the overall mood. You might have seen many films where there are clever and cruel manipulators who play others in masterly ways, but Gone Girl deviates from all these films in the way that it ends, which justifies the especially long epilogue. You won’t have a clue. I have a great urge to add a final one line that would aptly sum up the content of Gone Girl, but I’d hate to be a spoiler for you. Read the comments section for that one line if you want to. Watch Gone Girl in theaters. It is undoubtedly one of the best of this year and perhaps the last few years too.

Unpredictable and taut crime drama 4/5

Thursday, 30 October 2014

TICKET OF THE WEEK: BRAD PITT vs. BEN AFLECK

This week is really exciting as tow big stars come together for a clash at the Indian box office. Two weeks earlier it was Robert Downey Jr. vs. Nicholas Cage, in a battle that Downey seems to have won quite convincingly. This week it gets bigger with new poster boy of ‘pure’ cinema Ben Afleck and old faithful Brad Pitt fighting it out. The good thins is both their movies carry excellent pre-release and overseas reports, and neither of them is a routine action plot with the hero firing at aliens or terrorists.
                            

Gone Girl:


Ben Afleck is back in the big time after a couple of years. After Argo, great things are being expected of him every time he does anything on the screen, and Gone Girl seems to be one that has the potential of living up to all those expectations. Billed as a thriller, it shows the character of Ben Afleck being framed for the murder of his wife. Sounds like a very interesting premise and for those who have seen Argo and know the promise that Ben Afleck holds as a cinematic brain, then you surely wouldn’t miss this one.

Fury:



Brad Pitt on screen is always an exciting prospect, and when it is in the action/drama category, it is bound to be almost irresistible. Pitt’s last outing was World War Z which didn’t quite satisfy everyone. This time, he drops the Z and goes back to a real world war and explores the minds of soldiers marching to the warfront. Any movie based on a World War will have interesting, gripping and often touching stories to tell. It is indeed a wonder that more than 60 years after these dark times ended, the stories about them, of the people who fought and died iijn them, and of the families that suffered in silence, are yet not fully told. It shows us that humanity itself was greatly challenged when the whole world went to war without knowing what or whom they were fighting. The movie has some well known faces besides Brad Pitt and is surely something you got to catch on the big screen.