We know the
drill with Taken 3! It has been the same over the last two movies. Miller (Liam
Neeson) has to save his family from some huge mafia or drug lord or flesh
trader who has somehow laid his hands on them. No matter how many people are
killed, how many cars blown up, how man buildings brought down, Miller doesn’t
care. He just wants his family safe.
It goes the same
way here too. But, there is a slightly more sinister twist this time. Miller
finds his wife Lennie dead in his bed. Before he knows there are cops pointing
guns at him. He has to prove his innocence all by himself, because he knows
that he has been framed by people who are really god at it. So, who’s framing
him and why? That’s the only thing that Taken 3 is worth watching for.
The Taken
franchise has worked mostly on Liam Neeson’s ability to pull of close range
action
sequences with the slickness of a professional. He did it perfectly in
Taken 1, which is why we loved it. But, in Taken 3, he seems to have slowed
down a lot. Especially the first chase when he is running on the road and over
fences, one can clearly make out that a body double has been used. That is shoddy
making and has no excuses! The action too does not match up to the standards of
the Taken franchise. The car chase looks more messy than exciting, with some
special effects looking cheesy (you would expect something similar in a medium
budget Tamil film). And, Liam Neeson escapes from too many car crashes without
a real good explanation. Come on, we know he is not Superman!
But, the biggest
let down is the script itself. It is just one action sequence set up after
another with different reasons. One wonders why Miller is so desperate to
contact his daughter in person just to tell her that he is okay, and risk
getting arrested and getting his daughter in big trouble. It just seems like
artificially induced spikes in the script because of lack of sufficient
material. Yes, we know Miller dotes on his daughter, but we also know he is
intelligent enough to sort out his priorities.
The best thing
about Taken 3 is not Liam Neeson. He does his usually senior-pro stuff with
ease. You will enjoy Forrest Whittaker’s nuanced performance as the detective.
He has employed a couple of unique mannerisms which he consistently follows,
and gets some very witty lines. But, his role is cut off for long periods in
the script, which spoils the fun.
One feels that
Taken 3 was just made because some people felt that there was some more juice
left in the franchise. The script is half baked and does not excite at all. The
action sequences are repetitive, and all what we have seen before, and
sometimes look half-heartedly done. If you like Liam Neeson’s trademark
underplay, and can enjoy Forrest Whittaker’s nuances, you might just about feel
not too bad about this. Otherwise, there’s nothing new to watch it for.
[The audience]Taken (3) for
granted
1.5/5
No comments:
Post a Comment