Reasons to watch Onaaiyum Aattukkuttiyum!
What leads to
such a guess? Onaakiyum Aattukkuttiyum, and a few other movies that he has
made. He takes a paid professional killer and almost makes him look like a
savior in OA. The kind of character that would have evoked no sympathies in the
hands of another director becomes the object of sympathy in the hands of
Mysskin. He makes the audience look beyond the dark veneer of the paid killer.
When the movie starts, the audience wants Wolf to be killed. But, in the end,
when he almost shoots himself, the audience hopes that he had lived. Mysskin
knows the emotional buttons to be pressed to make a bad man look good. He blurs
the line between good and bad.
Its not just OA
that proves this. Look at his other movies too. He gives a touch of pathos to
the death of almost each of his antagonists. Of course, there are characters
that he completely paints in black – like Naren in Mugamoodi, or the gang of
middle-aged perverts from Yudham Sei, or Prasanna in Anjathe, or Thamba in OA.
But, a lot of his characters are in gray and their death is shown with as much
emotion as the death of a protagonist. Anjaathe is a classy example of this
tendency of Mysskin. The way he shows Naren and Ajmal as the bad and the good,
respectively, at the beginning, flips sides midway and then gives a poignant
end to Ajmal’s character, stretching the scene a second longer to let us see
that he realized that he was wrong. That second changes our perception of the
character, making us think that it was just a misunderstanding that led to him
being what he was.
Cinema mostly
doesn’t care much about the background of its antagonists. When a bad guy dies,
very few film makers dwell on the family he leaves behind. Mysskin is one among
the few who does that. Recall the corrupt police officer who is shot dead close
to the climax of Yudhdham Sei. The camera stays on him for a second longer than
it would in a normal Tamil movie, just to show us his mobile phone ringing; his
daughter is calling. Mysskin takes that moment to show us the human being
inside a criminal.
These are small
things, but very unique. When we want to make something look whiter than it
actually is, we can paint the surroundings black. The contrast gives us the
desired effect. Cinema works this way to make its protagonist seem like a hero.
Mysskin, one thinks, doesn’t like using too much of black or white, he deals in
gray. The closing scene of OA is a good example – Wolf, the bad guy to start
with, is lying dead with our sympathies, while the police men (the heroes to
start with) are standing there, heads hanging (in shame, or relief, or a
feeling of nothingness – we don’t know) Even the young man, who risked a lot to
save a life at the start of the film, doesn’t hesitate to shoot down a person
by the end. Mysskin deals in such extremes with ease.
Most of his
films can be boxed into these basic philosophies – about good not being
altogether good, about bad not being altogether bad, about everyone having a
bit of both in them. It just takes the right or wrong situation to bring out
the good or bad in us.
But, it is not
just these unique philosophies that are common to Mysskin films. There are some
very interesting quirks as well. No, we are not discussing the ‘yellow saree’
anymore. You wonder where he developed those fascinations; like the one he has
for dark. Dark seems to be his constant companion. One thought that there can’t
be more ‘dark’ shots than he had in Yudhdham Sei, but OA did it.
Also, he almost
always has a character who is differently abled; no matter how small the role.
Kuruvi from Anjathe, the hunchback in Mugamoodi, the blind family in OA. So
many occurrences cannot be seen as mere coincidence; it has to be deliberate,
for reasons only the director will know.
He definitely
has a fascination about men who can single handedly make an entire police force
look helpless. Go all the way back to Anjaathe; he had the entire city’s police
force going after the gang in the climax. Yudham Sei had a similar situation.
Mugamoodi took it to another level where all of Tamil Nadu’s police force was
clueless in a hostage situation. Now in OA, we have all of Chennai’s police
officers being led on a merry hunt by the Wolf. Mysskin certainly gets excited
at the thought of one man toying with the authorities.
But, the most
surprising, perhaps even confounding, tendency that Mysskin has shown
throughout his film making career is that of the ‘staged fight sequence’. For a
film maker who avoids the so called commercial trappings in all other
departments, his fights look strangely choreographed. It started with Anjaathe:
five men wearing sacks as masks, attacking a police officer one by one. It was
new then. But, when it repeated in Yudham Sei, we had a feeling of déjà vu. Why
is he repeating himself, many thought? Now, in OA, he has two Ninja warriors,
wearing war paint, carrying swords, waiting for their opponent to unzip his
jacket, tie the girl behind his back and adjust his sleeves before they attack
him. It crosses the line of realism and commercialism, goes into surrealism. In
a movie where guns talk more than men, why are there two Ninja warriors with
swords. Even if there are, why do they have to wait for their opponent to
arrange himself – this is not a kung fu tournament, they want to kill him.
Surely, a film maker with the sensibilities of Mysskin knows that this might
look odd, but he persists with this style – for reasons that only he knows.
All said and
done, Mysskin is a film maker who has a style that makes us sit up and take
notice. He thrills and makes us think, he might even make us weep. But, there
are some things about his style that are very difficult to understand. There’s
only one thing we can say for sure, he is unique and he is one of his kind in
Tamil cinema. Watch Onaaiyum Aattukuttiyum if you are not convinced about this.
Even if you are not convinced, you will enjoy the movie.
No comments:
Post a Comment